[Yocasta M.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2024) - visual impairment, waiver of right to counsel, subjective complaints, mental RFC 1) Whether the ALJ’s reasons

1) Whether the ALJ’s reasons for finding the opinion of Dr

the unique and subjective nature of chronic depression

2) The ALJ erred in relying on highly flawed medical expert testimony that conflicted with well established legal standards pertaining to the evaluation of Social Security disability claims

1) The Commissioner failed to properly address the impact of Appellant’s treatment regimen on her ability to perform sustained work activities

Magistrate Judge Shashi H

[Yocasta M.] v. Kijakazi (S.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2024) - visual impairment, waiver of right to counsel, subjective complaints, mental RFC 1) Whether the ALJ’s reasons[Yocasta M.] v. Kijakazi, No. 22 24081 CV, 2024 WL 1178961 (S. D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2024), report and recommendation adopted in part, rejected in part, No. 22 24081 CIV, 2024 WL 1131041 (S. D. Fla. Mar. 15, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. and U. S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodan) Briefs Included: Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Reply Brief, Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judges Report and