[Kathryn L.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024) - evaluation of pseudo seizures (psychogenic nonepileptic seizures), subjective complaints 2) The age categories were

2) The age categories were erroneously applied mechanically in a borderline situation

The parties negotiated the remandmterms and the court remanded for further proceedings

” Comm’r Motion at 1

the court awarded all § 406(b) fees sought

3) The ALJ’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) assessment is not supported by substantial evidence

[Kathryn L.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024) - evaluation of pseudo seizures (psychogenic nonepileptic seizures), subjective complaints 2) The age categories were[Kathryn L.] v. Commr of Soc. Sec., No. 23 1460, 2024 WL 400329 (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024) (Decision by Gibbons, White, and Thapar, Circuit Judges) Briefs Included: Appellants Initial Brief and Appellants Reply Brief Topics addressed: Listing medical equivalence RFC off task findings Testimony of lay witness Subjective symptoms lay evidence Subjective symptoms improper focus on objective evidence Subjective symptoms required findings Specific impairment